105 research outputs found

    Vertex Cover Gets Faster and Harder on Low Degree Graphs

    Full text link
    The problem of finding an optimal vertex cover in a graph is a classic NP-complete problem, and is a special case of the hitting set question. On the other hand, the hitting set problem, when asked in the context of induced geometric objects, often turns out to be exactly the vertex cover problem on restricted classes of graphs. In this work we explore a particular instance of such a phenomenon. We consider the problem of hitting all axis-parallel slabs induced by a point set P, and show that it is equivalent to the problem of finding a vertex cover on a graph whose edge set is the union of two Hamiltonian Paths. We show the latter problem to be NP-complete, and we also give an algorithm to find a vertex cover of size at most k, on graphs of maximum degree four, whose running time is 1.2637^k n^O(1)

    Fine-Grained Complexity of Rainbow Coloring and its Variants

    Get PDF
    Consider a graph G and an edge-coloring c_R:E(G) rightarrow [k]. A rainbow path between u,v in V(G) is a path P from u to v such that for all e,e\u27 in E(P), where e neq e\u27 we have c_R(e) neq c_R(e\u27). In the Rainbow k-Coloring problem we are given a graph G, and the objective is to decide if there exists c_R: E(G) rightarrow [k] such that for all u,v in V(G) there is a rainbow path between u and v in G. Several variants of Rainbow k-Coloring have been studied, two of which are defined as follows. The Subset Rainbow k-Coloring takes as an input a graph G and a set S subseteq V(G) times V(G), and the objective is to decide if there exists c_R: E(G) rightarrow [k] such that for all (u,v) in S there is a rainbow path between u and v in G. The problem Steiner Rainbow k-Coloring takes as an input a graph G and a set S subseteq V(G), and the objective is to decide if there exists c_R: E(G) rightarrow [k] such that for all u,v in S there is a rainbow path between u and v in G. In an attempt to resolve open problems posed by Kowalik et al. (ESA 2016), we obtain the following results. - For every k geq 3, Rainbow k-Coloring does not admit an algorithm running in time 2^{o(|E(G)|)}n^{O(1)}, unless ETH fails. - For every k geq 3, Steiner Rainbow k-Coloring does not admit an algorithm running in time 2^{o(|S|^2)}n^{O(1)}, unless ETH fails. - Subset Rainbow k-Coloring admits an algorithm running in time 2^{OO(|S|)}n^{O(1)}. This also implies an algorithm running in time 2^{o(|S|^2)}n^{O(1)} for Steiner Rainbow k-Coloring, which matches the lower bound we obtain

    Simultaneous Feedback Vertex Set: A Parameterized Perspective

    Get PDF
    Given a family of graphs F\mathcal{F}, a graph GG, and a positive integer kk, the F\mathcal{F}-Deletion problem asks whether we can delete at most kk vertices from GG to obtain a graph in F\mathcal{F}. F\mathcal{F}-Deletion generalizes many classical graph problems such as Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set, and Odd Cycle Transversal. A graph G=(V,i=1αEi)G = (V, \cup_{i=1}^{\alpha} E_{i}), where the edge set of GG is partitioned into α\alpha color classes, is called an α\alpha-edge-colored graph. A natural extension of the F\mathcal{F}-Deletion problem to edge-colored graphs is the α\alpha-Simultaneous F\mathcal{F}-Deletion problem. In the latter problem, we are given an α\alpha-edge-colored graph GG and the goal is to find a set SS of at most kk vertices such that each graph GiSG_i \setminus S, where Gi=(V,Ei)G_i = (V, E_i) and 1iα1 \leq i \leq \alpha, is in F\mathcal{F}. In this work, we study α\alpha-Simultaneous F\mathcal{F}-Deletion for F\mathcal{F} being the family of forests. In other words, we focus on the α\alpha-Simultaneous Feedback Vertex Set (α\alpha-SimFVS) problem. Algorithmically, we show that, like its classical counterpart, α\alpha-SimFVS parameterized by kk is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) and admits a polynomial kernel, for any fixed constant α\alpha. In particular, we give an algorithm running in 2O(αk)nO(1)2^{O(\alpha k)}n^{O(1)} time and a kernel with O(αk3(α+1))O(\alpha k^{3(\alpha + 1)}) vertices. The running time of our algorithm implies that α\alpha-SimFVS is FPT even when αo(logn)\alpha \in o(\log n). We complement this positive result by showing that for αO(logn)\alpha \in O(\log n), where nn is the number of vertices in the input graph, α\alpha-SimFVS becomes W[1]-hard. Our positive results answer one of the open problems posed by Cai and Ye (MFCS 2014)

    Feedback Vertex Set Inspired Kernel for Chordal Vertex Deletion

    Full text link
    Given a graph GG and a parameter kk, the Chordal Vertex Deletion (CVD) problem asks whether there exists a subset UV(G)U\subseteq V(G) of size at most kk that hits all induced cycles of size at least 4. The existence of a polynomial kernel for CVD was a well-known open problem in the field of Parameterized Complexity. Recently, Jansen and Pilipczuk resolved this question affirmatively by designing a polynomial kernel for CVD of size O(k161log58k)O(k^{161}\log^{58}k), and asked whether one can design a kernel of size O(k10)O(k^{10}). While we do not completely resolve this question, we design a significantly smaller kernel of size O(k12log10k)O(k^{12}\log^{10}k), inspired by the O(k2)O(k^2)-size kernel for Feedback Vertex Set. Furthermore, we introduce the notion of the independence degree of a vertex, which is our main conceptual contribution

    On the Parameterized Complexity of Clique Elimination Distance

    Get PDF

    On the Parameterized Complexity of Contraction to Generalization of Trees

    Get PDF
    For a family of graphs F, the F-Contraction problem takes as an input a graph G and an integer k, and the goal is to decide if there exists S subseteq E(G) of size at most k such that G/S belongs to F. Here, G/S is the graph obtained from G by contracting all the edges in S. Heggernes et al.[Algorithmica (2014)] were the first to study edge contraction problems in the realm of Parameterized Complexity. They studied cal F-Contraction when F is a simple family of graphs such as trees and paths. In this paper, we study the F-Contraction problem, where F generalizes the family of trees. In particular, we define this generalization in a "parameterized way". Let T_ell be the family of graphs such that each graph in T_ell can be made into a tree by deleting at most ell edges. Thus, the problem we study is T_ell-Contraction. We design an FPT algorithm for T_ell-Contraction running in time O((ncol)^{O(k + ell)} * n^{O(1)}). Furthermore, we show that the problem does not admit a polynomial kernel when parameterized by k. Inspired by the negative result for the kernelization, we design a lossy kernel for T_ell-Contraction of size O([k(k + 2ell)] ^{(lceil {frac{alpha}{alpha-1}rceil + 1)}})

    A Finite Algorithm for the Realizabilty of a Delaunay Triangulation

    Get PDF
    The \emph{Delaunay graph} of a point set PR2P \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2 is the plane graph with the vertex-set PP and the edge-set that contains {p,p}\{p,p'\} if there exists a disc whose intersection with PP is exactly {p,p}\{p,p'\}. Accordingly, a triangulated graph GG is \emph{Delaunay realizable} if there exists a triangulation of the Delaunay graph of some PR2P \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2, called a \emph{Delaunay triangulation} of PP, that is isomorphic to GG. The objective of \textsc{Delaunay Realization} is to compute a point set PR2P \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2 that realizes a given graph GG (if such a PP exists). Known algorithms do not solve \textsc{Delaunay Realization} as they are non-constructive. Obtaining a constructive algorithm for \textsc{Delaunay Realization} was mentioned as an open problem by Hiroshima et al.~\cite{hiroshima2000}. We design an nO(n)n^{\mathcal{O}(n)}-time constructive algorithm for \textsc{Delaunay Realization}. In fact, our algorithm outputs sets of points with {\em integer} coordinates
    corecore